Entrepreneurship
is being promoted in South as a possible source of job creation, empowerment
and economic dynamism, and this has seen a migration in policy and the voice of
opposition parties increasing attention on the subject. However, despite this
attention, there has been no systematic attempt to look at it from an angle of
a South African young person with his inherent challenges. 
We tend to incorporate the youth into the general adult population when it comes to some of the policy decision that drive enterprise development and we ignore their efforts to forge a livelihood through enterprise activities. We have stopped very short of understanding the potential benefits of youth entrepreneurship as a means of improving youth livelihoods.
Can youth entrepreneurship be promoted as a viable career option? What obstacles stand in its way? And what policy measures and strategies can be initiated to support it?
The need to encourage Youth entrepreneurship cannot be understated and below are some of the reasons why it should be encouraged:
- Employment: Enterprise
     has the potential to create employment opportunities for both the
     self-employed youth and other young people 
- Redress: it has a
     less centralized platform to bringing the alienated and
     marginalized youth into the economic mainstream 
- Socio-economic
     Solution: it
     has the potential to impact on some of the  problems and delinquency
     that arise from joblessness including crime and drug abuse. 
- Innovation: Youth   resilience
     is associated with innovation 
- Local economic
     development: it has the potential to revive and revitalize local community 
- Accessing fast
     paced economic opportunities: Young entrepreneurs may be particularly responsive to new
     economic opportunities and trends 
- Skills
     development: Enterprise helps young women and men develop new skills and
     experiences that can be applied to many other challenges in life. 
This article was born from attending an
Entrepreneurship Week, where all efforts were around the development of youth
owned enterprises. Naturally the irreplaceable value
of experience and post graduate education has meant that naturally
youth owned business will have the following inherent challenges. (Excuse me
for generalizing, but SEDA or a similar South African institute should
commission a study to verify):
- Youth businesses
     face problems of access to resources such as capital, especially if it is
     to be loaned, given the South African strict loan regiment under the
     National Credit Regulation (NCR). This is particularly more challenging
     for young people from impoverished communities, who do not have
     alternative sources;   
- The result is
     that young people will start their enterprises with lower levels of
     initial capital and will operate very small businesses that are more
     survival level (from hand to mouth as affectionately referred); 
- The biggest challenge
     with a low capital business includes lower market value or lower inventory
     book. This has played into the hands of heavily invested
     foreign subsidized small businesses, especially in the retail sector
     (a train vegetable vendor vs. a 500 product tuck
     shop)  ; 
- The result
     then becomes that youth entrepreneurs are engaged in a narrower range of
     activities. They tend to operate from homes or streets (lack of
     access to space); 
Given
that in South Africa we have the National Youth Development Agency, and I
hesitate to be critical of their efforts to promote youth entrepreneurship. I
would like to remain true to the objective of this blog and share Ten (10)
cardinal rule that can drastically improve this sector:
-  Clear Objective. Any programme that promotes youth entrepreneurship should not
     attempt to combine social and economic objectives. Many youth enterprise
     promotion programmes fail because of a multiplicity of objectives. Someone
     in a position of prominence like the NYDA should identify a
     future sector of growth and shape the development of youth entrepreneurs
     to fulfill the market demands of that growth sector.
     Preparations for the world cup in 2010 were way advance before we realized that
     we had a shortage of welders (artisans) and I believe that this
     was an ideal opportunity to have groomed at the announcement of the bids’
     success, a model for owner managed artisan youth enterprises. These
     businesses would be instrumental in helping Transnet and PRASA today with
     their Capital programmes, which are estimated in the multiple billions.
     Unfortunate this bus has left the port and this competence will sourced
     internationally. 
- Commercial Orientation. A development agency
     (NYDA) has the responsibility to instill and enthuse a sense of
     professionalism and commercial will. It is not a welfare’ or social
     services, this will mandate the agency to develop a professional
     capability and technical competence that is critical to the success of
     youth enterprise support programmes.
- Adequate funding. Available literature shows that youth
     enterprise support programmes in many developing countries fail due to,
     among other factors, inadequate funding. NYDA is a well-funded
     organisation and has adequate funding to help its clients. 
- Well-trained and properly supported staff. The agency requires staff with professional capability in their
     operations. Given how competitive the labour market is in South Africa,
     this should also be established with staff retention programmes in place.
     Staff should be trained and properly supported in their work. Lack of
     technically competent staff and/or staff that lack entrepreneurial
     experience is a major factor that explains the failure of youth enterprise
     support programmes in many countries.
- Flexible and adaptable operation style. Rigid administrative procedures are a factor in the failure of
     youth enterprise promotion programmes in many countries.
- An ‘integrated’ package for youth. The Agencies support for young people should not only be limited
     to the resources that the youth can gain from the Agency like credit and
     voucher services. Such a minimalist approach has a danger of limited
     development with similar beneficiaries going through the system over and
     over with new ideas every-time. The birth of the Tenderpreneurs in
     the past decade is an example. The agency should provide a wide range of
     services to youth, including skills training and advice. This is based on
     the recognition that young people pass through various stages of
     transition and therefore tend to face problems specific to those
     transitions.
- Customer-centered loans. The treatment of the youth as mere beneficiaries is the key
     challenge in this area and hence the reason why all loans are treated to
     youth owned businesses are treated the same. Firstly I believe all loans
     should be issued condition to a viable business plan and accepting a
     mentor.  Secondly, all youth entrepreneurs should be treated as
     clients as opposed to beneficiaries. Thirdly there should be a shift from
     standardized programmes that are not sensitive to the needs of individual
     youth and therefore have little impact on youth entrepreneurship
     promotion. For
     example, a young professional who has just graduated from University and
     after realising that he had no prospect in the employment sector and they
     started business. Statistics tells us that this is the most successful
     entrepreneur currently in SMME sector in South Africa (SMME's ran by
     Professionals). Currently as things stand this guy cannot be loaned money
     by the NYDA unless he had surety from someone who is employed. This is the
     case even when such a professional has a contract with a reliable third
     party and they only require bridge financing. The strength of
     the contract and the success of the sector of business they have venture
     into do not count for much in their credit rating.  
- Proper targeting and selection. Young people are not a homogeneous, and thus the Agency
     needs to make an attempts to identify variations amongst young women and
     men in their skills, experiences, status, needs, aspirations and capacity
     to obtain resources – all of which influence their ability to establish
     and run a small business successfully. This is the blueprint that we lack
     in South Africa, on how we can help young people from school going age to
     choose Entrepreneurship as a career. The difference from reading a Robert
     Kiyosaki book and being nurtured in to the profession is the intelligence
     we are able to build as a country on the subject. The motivation of
     foreign Business heroes like the Donald Trumps and Richard Branson are
     different from that of a South African rural youth.
- Mentoring. NYDA needs a strong and highly
     effective mentoring programme that is designed to provide young people
     with informal advice and guidance on how to properly manage their
     businesses. This will help youth entrepreneurs to overcome the constraints
     of limited business experience, contacts and skills. Through
     mentoring and other business support services, young people will learn to deal
     with the risks that they face in running their enterprises.
- A supportive policy environment. Favourable changes in the regulatory environment can have a
     positive impact on the provision of business development support to the youth
     entrepreneurs;
 
Interesting perspective, I wonder if relevant are taking notice
ReplyDelete